Anti-terrorism Legal Framework in Indonesia: Its Development and Challenges

Indonesia is a nation that has been subject to many of high profile terrorist cases. In relation to this, Indonesia's legal framework on anti-terrorism contains provisions that have been generally practiced by other countries. After the 2002 Bali Bombing, the Indonesian government issued Govern...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Santoso, T. (Topo) (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2013
In: Jurnal Mimbar Hukum
Jahr: 2013
Online-Zugang: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1866614894
003 DE-627
005 20250121054910.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231020s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1866614894 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1866614894 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Santoso, T. (Topo)  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Anti-terrorism Legal Framework in Indonesia: Its Development and Challenges 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Indonesia is a nation that has been subject to many of high profile terrorist cases. In relation to this, Indonesia's legal framework on anti-terrorism contains provisions that have been generally practiced by other countries. After the 2002 Bali Bombing, the Indonesian government issued Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perpu) No. 1/2002 on Anti-terrorism and Perpu No. 2/2002 (which made the Perpu No.1/2002 retroactively applicable to the Bali bombings). The parliament adopted both in early 2003 in the form of Law No. 15/2003 and Law No. 16/2003. The Constitutional Court decided that Law No. 16/2003 was in-constitutional, because it was against principle of non-retroactivity stipulated under Article 28I of the 1945 Constitution. Indonesia adalah korban dari beberapa serangan teroris bersakal besar. Terkait terorisme ini, kerangka hukum anti-terorisme telah memuat ketentuan-ketentuan yang secara umum juga diterima oleh berbagai negara. Pasca Bom Bali tahun 2002, lahirlah Peraturan Pengganti Undang-Undang (Perpu) No. 1/2002 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Terorisme dan Perpu No. 2/2002 yang memberlakukan surut Perpu 1/2002 untuk peristiwa Bom Bali. Dua Perpu itu kemudian diterima menjadi Undang-Undang (UU) oleh Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR) dalam bentuk UU No. 15/2003 dan UU 15/2003. Mahkamah Konstitusi memutuskan bahwa ketentuan pemberlakuan surut itu bertentangan dengan asas non-retroaktif yang tercantum dalam Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 khususnya Pasal 28I 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Jurnal Mimbar Hukum  |d Yogyakarta : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2006  |g (2013)  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)821519727  |w (DE-600)2815869-6  |w (DE-576)428513239  |x 0852-100X  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g year:2013 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/298733128.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4394251486 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1866614894 
LOK |0 005 20231020043719 
LOK |0 008 231020||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE45593295 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw