The Public Safety Exception to <em>Miranda</em>: Analyzing Subjective Motivation

This Note argues, however, that the appropriate inquiry under Quarles is whether an actual and reasonable belief in an emergency motivated the interrogating officer. This Note proposes a two-prong test to facilitate this inquiry. The subjective motivation prong evaluates the officer's subjectiv...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Reiner, Marc Schuyler (Author)
Format: Electronic Book
Language:English
Published: 1995
In:Year: 1995
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Check availability: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 1866601695
003 DE-627
005 20250126054918.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231020s1995 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1866601695 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1866601695 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Reiner, Marc Schuyler  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Public Safety Exception to <em>Miranda</em>: Analyzing Subjective Motivation 
264 1 |c 1995 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This Note argues, however, that the appropriate inquiry under Quarles is whether an actual and reasonable belief in an emergency motivated the interrogating officer. This Note proposes a two-prong test to facilitate this inquiry. The subjective motivation prong evaluates the officer's subjective motivation as revealed by objective factors: the. content of the officer's questions, when he asked them, and when the suspect received Miranda warnings. The objective reasonableness prong looks at the objective circumstances to determine the reasonableness of the officer's belief in an emergency. Part I demonstrates that the Quarles opinion actually contemplates and requires analysis of the officer's subjective motivation and therefore comports with this Note's test. Part II then fully describes the subjective motivation prong of this Note's test; it outlines which objective factors are most probative of the officer's subjective intent. Part ID outlines the objective reasonableness prong of this Note's test; it argues that the perceived danger must be both reasonably substantial and reasonably imminent in order to satisfy this prong. Part IV then argues that courts have implicitly or explicitly looked to an officer's subjective motivation and that doing so best comports with the policies of Miranda and Quarles 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/232716330.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4394238285 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1866601695 
LOK |0 005 20231020043656 
LOK |0 008 231020||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE69342956 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw