|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000cam a22000002c 4500 |
| 001 |
1866588753 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20250128054853.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
231020s1979 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)1866588753
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)KXP1866588753
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rda
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 084 |
|
|
|a 2,1
|2 ssgn
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Kamisar, Yale
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
4 |
|a The Exclusionary Rule in Historical Perspective: The Struggle to Make the Fourth Amendment More than 'An Empty Blessing'
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 1979
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a In the 65 years since the Supreme Court adopted the exclusionary rule, few critics have attacked it with as much vigor and on as many fronts as did Judge Malcolm Wilkey in his recent Judicature article, The exclusionary rule: why suppress valid evidence? (November 1978)
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://core.ac.uk/download/232689808.pdf
|x Verlag
|z kostenfrei
|3 Volltext
|
| 935 |
|
|
|a mkri
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a BO
|
| ELC |
|
|
|a 1
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 001 4394225345
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 003 DE-627
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 004 1866588753
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 005 20231020043636
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 008 231020||||||||||||||||ger|||||||
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 035
|a (DE-2619)CORE69322611
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 040
|a DE-2619
|c DE-627
|d DE-2619
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 092
|o n
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852
|a DE-2619
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852 1
|9 00
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 935
|a core
|
| OAS |
|
|
|a 1
|
| ORI |
|
|
|a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw
|
