|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000cam a22000002c 4500 |
| 001 |
1866581848 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20250113054909.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
231020s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)1866581848
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)KXP1866581848
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rda
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 084 |
|
|
|a 2,1
|2 ssgn
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Bao, Michelle
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a It's COMPASlicated: The Messy Relationship between RAI Datasets and Algorithmic Fairness Benchmarks
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2021
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Risk assessment instrument (RAI) datasets, particularly ProPublica's COMPAS dataset, are commonly used in algorithmic fairness papers due to benchmarking practices of comparing algorithms on datasets used in prior work. In many cases, this data is used as a benchmark to demonstrate good performance without accounting for the complexities of criminal justice (CJ) processes. However, we show that pretrial RAI datasets can contain numerous measurement biases and errors, and due to disparities in discretion and deployment, algorithmic fairness applied to RAI datasets is limited in making claims about real-world outcomes. These reasons make the datasets a poor fit for benchmarking under assumptions of ground truth and real-world impact. Furthermore, conventional practices of simply replicating previous data experiments may implicitly inherit or edify normative positions without explicitly interrogating value-laden assumptions. Without context of how interdisciplinary fields have engaged in CJ research and context of how RAIs operate upstream and downstream, algorithmic fairness practices are misaligned for meaningful contribution in the context of CJ, and would benefit from transparent engagement with normative considerations and values related to fairness, justice, and equality. These factors prompt questions about whether benchmarks for intrinsically socio-technical systems like the CJ system can exist in a beneficial and ethical way
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Zottola, Samantha
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Zhou, Angela
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Venkatasubramanian, Suresh
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Lum, Kristian
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Horowitz, Aaron
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Desmarais, Sarah
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Brubach, Brian
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05498
|x Verlag
|z kostenfrei
|3 Volltext
|
| 935 |
|
|
|a mkri
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a BO
|
| ELC |
|
|
|a 1
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 001 4394218438
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 003 DE-627
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 004 1866581848
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 005 20231020043627
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 008 231020||||||||||||||||ger|||||||
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 035
|a (DE-2619)CORE113890605
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 040
|a DE-2619
|c DE-627
|d DE-2619
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 092
|o n
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852
|a DE-2619
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852 1
|9 00
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 935
|a core
|
| OAS |
|
|
|a 1
|
| ORI |
|
|
|a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw
|
