The validity and utility of violence risk assessment tools to predict patient violence in acute care settings: An integrative literature review

To examine risk assessment tools to predict patient violence in acute care settings. An integrative review of the literature. Five electronic databases – CINAHL Plus, MEDLINE, OVID, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were searched between 2000 and 2018. The reference list of articles was also inspected ma...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: De Jong, Gideon (Autor)
Otros Autores: Twigg, Di ; Towell-Barnard, Amanda ; Kutzer, Yvonne ; Ghosh, Manonita ; Dodds, Mary
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Libro
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2019
En:Año: 2019
Acceso en línea: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 1866342029
003 DE-627
005 20250114054914.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231019s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1866342029 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1866342029 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a De Jong, Gideon  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The validity and utility of violence risk assessment tools to predict patient violence in acute care settings: An integrative literature review 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a To examine risk assessment tools to predict patient violence in acute care settings. An integrative review of the literature. Five electronic databases – CINAHL Plus, MEDLINE, OVID, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were searched between 2000 and 2018. The reference list of articles was also inspected manually. The PICOS framework was used to refine the inclusion and exclusion of the literature, and the PRISMA statement guided the search strategy to systematically present findings. Forty-one studies were retained for review. Three studies developed or tested tools to measure patient violence in general acute care settings, and two described the primary and secondary development of tools in emergency departments. The remaining studies reported on risk assessment tools that were developed or tested in psychiatric inpatient settings. In total, 16 violence risk assessment tools were identified. Thirteen of them were developed to assess the risk of violence in psychiatric patients. Two of them were found to be accurate and reliable to predict violence in acute psychiatric facilities and have practical utility for general acute care settings. Two assessment tools were developed and administered in general acute care, and one was developed to predict patient violence in emergency departments. There is no single, user-friendly, standardized evidence-based tool available for predicting violence in general acute care hospitals. Some were found to be accurate in assessing violence in psychiatric inpatients and have potential for use in general acute care, require further testing to assess their validity and reliability 
700 1 |a Twigg, Di  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Towell-Barnard, Amanda  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kutzer, Yvonne  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Ghosh, Manonita  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Dodds, Mary  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/268897667.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4392987752 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1866342029 
LOK |0 005 20231019043724 
LOK |0 008 231019||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE75272168 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw