Applying a Strict Discovery Rule to Art Stolen in the Past

There is a great deal of un-recovered stolen art, and a great deal of confusion within and among jurisdictions as to when the applicable statute of limitations for stolen art begins to run. Holistic legal reform in this area is long overdue. Recent proposals, responding to current practices in the a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Preziosi, Tarquin (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Buch
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 1997
In:Jahr: 1997
Online-Zugang: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 1866339648
003 DE-627
005 20250126054914.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231019s1997 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1866339648 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1866339648 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Preziosi, Tarquin  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Applying a Strict Discovery Rule to Art Stolen in the Past 
264 1 |c 1997 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a There is a great deal of un-recovered stolen art, and a great deal of confusion within and among jurisdictions as to when the applicable statute of limitations for stolen art begins to run. Holistic legal reform in this area is long overdue. Recent proposals, responding to current practices in the art world, call for the adoption of an art theft registry to help effectuate the return of stolen art and provide efficiency in the marketplace. However, a great number of objects fall outside the effective scope of these proposals: art that was stolen in the past, and those artworks which are not subject to effective registration. This Note suggests that these twin problems of retroactivity and non-registrability are best dealt with by the adoption of a strict discovery rule. This rule provides that the statute of limitations does not begin to run until the true owner becomes aware of the identity of the possessor of his or her artwork-irrespective of the owner's diligence in searching for the art. This Note thus proposes a two-part solution to the problems inherent in determining when the statute of limitations for stolen art begins to run: (1) future victims of art theft would be required to register their stolen artwork in order to toll the statute of limitations; and (2) victims of past thefts, or future victims of art theft whose artworks are not registrable, will have the statute of limitations tolled until they become aware of the identity of the current possessor of their artworks 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/230144336.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4392985377 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1866339648 
LOK |0 005 20231019043720 
LOK |0 008 231019||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE68254450 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw