|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a22000002c 4500 |
001 |
1866338463 |
003 |
DE-627 |
005 |
20250124054906.0 |
007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
008 |
231019s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)1866338463
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)KXP1866338463
|
040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rda
|
041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
084 |
|
|
|a 2,1
|2 ssgn
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Chin, Gabriel J.
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Unjustified: The Practical Irrelevance of the Justification/Excuse Distinction
|
264 |
|
1 |
|c 2009
|
336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
520 |
|
|
|a In recent decades, the distinction between justification and excuse defenses has been a favorite topic of theorists of philosophy and criminal law. Notwithstanding the impressive intellectual efforts devoted to the task, no single scholar or viewpoint appears to be on the verge of generating practical consensus about the concepts of justification and excuse, categorization of the defenses, or categorization of difficult individual cases. This Essay suggests that none of these goals can be usefully advanced through the justification/excuse distinction
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://core.ac.uk/download/232710432.pdf
|x Verlag
|z kostenfrei
|3 Volltext
|
935 |
|
|
|a mkri
|
951 |
|
|
|a BO
|
ELC |
|
|
|a 1
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 001 4392984192
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 003 DE-627
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 004 1866338463
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 005 20231019043717
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 008 231019||||||||||||||||ger|||||||
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 035
|a (DE-2619)CORE69336871
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 040
|a DE-2619
|c DE-627
|d DE-2619
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 092
|o n
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 852
|a DE-2619
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 852 1
|9 00
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 935
|a core
|
OAS |
|
|
|a 1
|
ORI |
|
|
|a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw
|