Realism, Punishment & Reform [A Reply to Braman, Kahan, and Hoffman, Some Realism About Punishment Naturalism”]

Professors Donald Braman, Dan Kahan, and David Hoffman, in their article Some Realism About Punishment Naturalism, to be published in an upcoming issue of the University of Chicago Law Review, critique a series of our articles: Concordance and Conflict in Intuitions of Justice (http://ssrn.com/abstr...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Jones, Owen D. (Autor)
Otros Autores: Robinson, Paul H ; Kurzban, Robert O.
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Libro
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2010
En:Año: 2010
Acceso en línea: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 1866338072
003 DE-627
005 20250123054849.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231019s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1866338072 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1866338072 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Jones, Owen D.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Realism, Punishment & Reform [A Reply to Braman, Kahan, and Hoffman, Some Realism About Punishment Naturalism”] 
264 1 |c 2010 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Professors Donald Braman, Dan Kahan, and David Hoffman, in their article Some Realism About Punishment Naturalism, to be published in an upcoming issue of the University of Chicago Law Review, critique a series of our articles: Concordance and Conflict in Intuitions of Justice (http://ssrn.com/abstract=932067), The Origins of Shared Intuitions of Justice (http://.ssrn.com/abstract=952726), and Intuitions of Justice: Implications for Criminal Law and Justice Policy (http://.ssrn.com/abstract=976026). Our reply, here, follows their article in that coming issue. As we demonstrate, they have misunderstood our views on, and thus the implications of, widespread agreement about punishing the core of wrongdoing. Although much of their attack is therefore misplaced, important disagreements may remain concerning: whether there is a meaningful difference between core and non-core cases; whether judgments about core cases are less malleable than judgments about non-core cases; and whether imposing punishments perceived to be unjust imposes, in turn, significant costs on the criminal justice system. Which of the disputed views is correct can have important implications for the administration of criminal justice. Far from being anti-reformists, as accused, we argue that Reform Realism is the most effective path to bringing about needed reforms 
700 1 |a Robinson, Paul H  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kurzban, Robert O.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/151683272.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4392983803 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1866338072 
LOK |0 005 20231019043716 
LOK |0 008 231019||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE49688809 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw