|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a22000002c 4500 |
001 |
186633607X |
003 |
DE-627 |
005 |
20250207054836.0 |
007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
008 |
231019nuuuuuuuuxx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)186633607X
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)KXP186633607X
|
040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rda
|
041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
084 |
|
|
|a 2,1
|2 ssgn
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Clare Ringland
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
245 |
1 |
4 |
|a The impact of intensive correction orders on re-offending
|
336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
520 |
|
|
|a This study examined the risk of re-offending of those who received an intensive correction order, relative to those who received periodic detention and suspended sentences with supervision. Method: Details of offenders’ demographic and offence characteristics, prior convictions and penalties received, and re-offences were extracted from the Re-offending Database maintained by the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research. Using propensity score modelling, offenders who received an ICO as a principal penalty in a NSW court between 1 October 2010 and 30 September 2012 were matched to two comparable groups of offenders who received periodic detention between 1 October 2007 and 30 September 2009 and suspended sentences with supervision between 1 October 2010 and 30 September 2012. A supplementary comparison with those who received suspended sentences with supervision included matching on Level of Service Inventory - Revised (LSI-R) assessment scores, in addition to demographic and offending characteristics. Time to first re-offence was estimated using the Nelson-Aalen estimator of the cumulative hazard rate function and compared between groups using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: An offender on an ICO had 33 per cent less risk of re-offending than an offender on periodic detention (HR=0.67, 95% confidence interval (0.55, 0.83), p<.001). There was no significant difference in re-offending between those who received ICOs and supervised suspended sentences after taking into account LSI-R assessment scores. Conclusion: There is some evidence to suggest that ICOs are more effective than periodic detention in terms of re-offending rates. However, future evaluations should include more detailed offender, treatment and program participation information in order to better understand any observed differences between comparison groups
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Research
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Don Weatherburn
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/30674696.pdf
|x Verlag
|z kostenfrei
|3 Volltext
|
935 |
|
|
|a mkri
|
951 |
|
|
|a BO
|
ELC |
|
|
|a 1
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 001 4392981800
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 003 DE-627
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 004 186633607X
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 005 20231019043714
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 008 231019||||||||||||||||ger|||||||
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 035
|a (DE-2619)CORE19214479
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 040
|a DE-2619
|c DE-627
|d DE-2619
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 092
|o n
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 852
|a DE-2619
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 852 1
|9 00
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 935
|a core
|
OAS |
|
|
|a 1
|
ORI |
|
|
|a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw
|