A review of restorative justice responses to offending

Restorative justice has been enthusiastically embraced in many justice systems as an alternative to incarceration for young adult and Indigenous offenders. But how well does it work? Abstract The present review sought to determine on the available evidence (a) whether restorative justice (RJ) is an...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Don Weatherburn (Autor)
Otros Autores: Megan Macadam
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2013
En: Evidence base
Año: 2013, Volumen: 1, Páginas: 1-20
Acceso en línea: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 186633428X
003 DE-627
005 20250121054905.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231019s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)186633428X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP186633428X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Don Weatherburn  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 2 |a A review of restorative justice responses to offending 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Restorative justice has been enthusiastically embraced in many justice systems as an alternative to incarceration for young adult and Indigenous offenders. But how well does it work? Abstract The present review sought to determine on the available evidence (a) whether restorative justice (RJ) is an effective means of reducing re-offending, (b) what benefits victims of crime obtain from participation in the RJ process, (c) whether the public supports the principles of RJ, and (d) how the cost and efficiency of RJ proceedings compare with conventional courts in cost and efficiency (i.e. time taken to finalize cases). The review finds little reliable evidence that RJ reduces re-offending. Victims who participate in RJ are generally satisfied with the experience but it is unclear whether they are more satisfied than victims in similar cases that are dealt with in court. The limited evidence available suggests that the public supports the principles of RJ. It appears to be a less expensive and more efficient way of finalizing criminal cases involving young people but, once again, the evidence on this issue at this stage is rather limited. Evidence Base, issue 1, 201 
650 4 |a Research 
700 1 |a Megan Macadam  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Evidence base  |d [Carlton, Victoria] : Australia and New Zealand School of Government, 2012  |g 1(2013), Seite 1-20  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)1677083425  |w (DE-600)2984180-X  |x 1838-9422  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:1  |g year:2013  |g pages:1-20 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/30674361.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4392980014 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 186633428X 
LOK |0 005 20231019043710 
LOK |0 008 231019||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE19214886 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw