Placing the poor while keeping the rich in their place

A central objective of modern US housing policy is deconcentrating poverty through "housing mobility programs" that move poor families into middle class neighborhoods. Pursuing these policies too aggressively risks inducing middle class flight, but being too cautious squanders the opportun...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Dieter Grass (Autor)
Otros Autores: Yuri Yegorov ; Michael Johnson ; Jonathan P. Caulkins ; Gustav Feichtinger ; Gernot Tragler
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Libro
Lenguaje:Inglés
Acceso en línea: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 1866333348
003 DE-627
005 20250207054831.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231019nuuuuuuuuxx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1866333348 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1866333348 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Dieter Grass  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Placing the poor while keeping the rich in their place 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a A central objective of modern US housing policy is deconcentrating poverty through "housing mobility programs" that move poor families into middle class neighborhoods. Pursuing these policies too aggressively risks inducing middle class flight, but being too cautious squanders the opportunity to help more poor families. This paper presents a stylized dynamicoptimization model that captures this tension. With base-caseparameter values, cost considerations limit mobility programs before flight becomes excessive. However, for modest departures reflecting stronger flight tendencies and/or weaker destination neighborhoods, other outcomes emerge. In particular, we find state-dependence and multiple equilibria, including both de-populated and oversized outcomes. For certain sets of parameters there exists a Skiba point that separates initial conditions for which the optimal strategy leads to substantial flight and depopulation from those for which the optimal strategy retains or even expands the middle class population. These results suggest the value of estimating middle-class neighborhoods' "carrying capacity" for absorbing mobility program placements and further modeling of dynamic response.housing policy, multiple equilibria, negative externality, optimal control, segregation, separation, Skiba point 
650 4 |a Research 
700 1 |a Yuri Yegorov  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Michael Johnson  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Jonathan P. Caulkins  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Gustav Feichtinger  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Gernot Tragler  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/7127359.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4392979075 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1866333348 
LOK |0 005 20231019043709 
LOK |0 008 231019||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE3006529 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw