The Federal Criminal Code Is a Disgrace: Obstruction Statutes as Case Study

Any discussion of federal penal law must begin with an important caveat: There actually is no federal criminal code worthy of the name. A criminal code is defined as 'a systematic collection, compendium, or revision' of laws. What the federal government has is a haphazard grab-bag of statu...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: O'Sullivan, Julie R. (Author)
Format: Electronic Book
Language:English
Published: 2006
In:Year: 2006
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Check availability: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 1866329804
003 DE-627
005 20250124054905.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231019s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1866329804 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1866329804 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a O'Sullivan, Julie R.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Federal Criminal Code Is a Disgrace: Obstruction Statutes as Case Study 
264 1 |c 2006 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Any discussion of federal penal law must begin with an important caveat: There actually is no federal criminal code worthy of the name. A criminal code is defined as 'a systematic collection, compendium, or revision' of laws. What the federal government has is a haphazard grab-bag of statutes accumulated over 200 years, rather than a comprehensive, thoughtful, and internally consistent system of criminal law. In fact, the federal government has never had a true criminal code. The closest Congress has come to enacting a code was its creation of Title 18 of the United States Code in 1948. That exercise, however, accomplished little more than sweeping a host of internally-disorganized statutes containing fragmentary coverage into a series of chapters laid out in...alphabetical order. Readers should be cautioned, then, that the author's use of the term federal criminal code within this article is simply a shorthand for an incomprehensible, random and incoherent, duplicative, ambiguous, incomplete, and organizationally nonsensical mass of federal legislation that carries criminal penalties. To begin with the optimal, an effective and just system of penal laws should be: drafted by elected representatives to be as clear and explicit as possible so that citizens have fair notice of that which will subject them to criminal sanction; public; accessible; comprehensive; internally consistent; reasonably stable; rationally organized to avoid redundancy and ensure appropriate grading of offense seriousness; prospective only in application; and capable of uniform, non-arbitrary, and nondiscriminatory enforcement. No code drafted by human beings and produced by political institutions can meet all of these criteria. What is shameful about the state of federal penal law, however, is that none of these characteristics can be claimed by our code and our elected officials have made no serious effort to correct that glaring fact for decades. The author attempts to substantiate this proposition generally in part I and particularly in part II's examination of certain federal obstruction of justice statutes. Although previous code reform efforts in the 1960's through the 1980's failed, they did yield something that made the deficiencies of the substantive code more tolerable: the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. Explained at greater length in part III, in pre-Guidelines practice, judges had vast discretion in sentencing criminal offenders; their choice of sentence was constrained only by the statutory maximum Congress set for the offense of conviction (e.g., 0-10 years). Because prosecutors often could choose among a variety of overlapping charges, many of which carried different statutory maximums, prosecutors' discretionary charging choices greatly affected the defendant's sentencing exposure 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/231035074.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4392975533 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1866329804 
LOK |0 005 20231019043704 
LOK |0 008 231019||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE36646799 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw