|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000cam a22000002c 4500 |
| 001 |
1866329545 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20250123054849.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
231019s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)1866329545
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)KXP1866329545
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rda
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 084 |
|
|
|a 2,1
|2 ssgn
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Bell, Amber A.
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a McKenzie v. Day: Is Twenty Years on Death Row Cruel and Unusual Punishment?
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2010
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a In 1976, the United States Supreme Court decided that capital punishment does not violate the Eighth Amendment's protection against cruel and unusual punishment. This note raises the question whether extended incarceration on death row invokes the protections of the Eighth Amendment. This note examines four aspects of this issue. First, it traces the facts and procedural history of McKenzie. Second, the history of cruel and unusual punishment jurisprudence is discussed. Third, it details and analyzes the majority and dissenting opinions. Finally, it demonstrates that McKenzie is a poorly reasoned opinion
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://core.ac.uk/download/233101131.pdf
|x Verlag
|z kostenfrei
|3 Volltext
|
| 935 |
|
|
|a mkri
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a BO
|
| ELC |
|
|
|a 1
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 001 4392975274
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 003 DE-627
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 004 1866329545
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 005 20231019043703
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 008 231019||||||||||||||||ger|||||||
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 035
|a (DE-2619)CORE38274851
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 040
|a DE-2619
|c DE-627
|d DE-2619
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 092
|o n
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852
|a DE-2619
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852 1
|9 00
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 935
|a core
|
| OAS |
|
|
|a 1
|
| ORI |
|
|
|a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw
|
