An Examination of the Effects of Post-Identification Feedback on Jurors

Post-identification feedback (PIF) occurs when witnesses are given feedback following their identification choices. This feedback has been shown to alter witnesses’ retrospective judgments regarding their witnessing experience (e.g., they are more confident that they made a correct identification)....

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Cash, Daniella (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Libro
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2019
En:Año: 2019
Acceso en línea: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 186632716X
003 DE-627
005 20250114054913.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231019s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)186632716X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP186632716X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Cash, Daniella  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a An Examination of the Effects of Post-Identification Feedback on Jurors 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Post-identification feedback (PIF) occurs when witnesses are given feedback following their identification choices. This feedback has been shown to alter witnesses’ retrospective judgments regarding their witnessing experience (e.g., they are more confident that they made a correct identification). PIF effects are robust; they impact witnesses’ memory of their experience, and also appear to act as confirmation to jurors who are asked to assess witness reliability. A current recommendation for eyewitness procedures is that identifications should be recorded and shown to jurors at trial, but this might be harmful if jurors are also negatively impacted by this suggestive feedback. The goal of the current study was to further evaluate how PIF can impact jurors’ assessments of witnesses. Across two experiments, I failed to find evidence that viewing eyewitnesses receiving PIF impacted mock-jurors’ perceptions of the witness or of their own performance. Additionally, the presence of PIF warnings in Experiment 2 did not impact participants’ perceptions of either the witness or their own performance. Given the recent push for videotaped identification procedures, the findings from these studies are timely and beneficial to the legal system 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/223232794.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4392972895 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 186632716X 
LOK |0 005 20231019043700 
LOK |0 008 231019||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE64264596 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw