Beyond Lawrence: Metaprivacy and Punishment

Lawrence v. Texas remains, after three years of precedential life, an opinion in search of a principle. It is both libertarian – Randy Barnett has called it the constitutionalization of John Stuart Mill's On Liberty – and communitarian – William Eskridge has described it as the gay rights movem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Greene, Jamal (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2005
In: The Yale law journal
Jahr: 2005
Online-Zugang: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1866322397
003 DE-627
005 20250125054922.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231019s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2307/20455675  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1866322397 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1866322397 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Greene, Jamal  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Beyond Lawrence: Metaprivacy and Punishment 
264 1 |c 2005 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Lawrence v. Texas remains, after three years of precedential life, an opinion in search of a principle. It is both libertarian – Randy Barnett has called it the constitutionalization of John Stuart Mill's On Liberty – and communitarian – William Eskridge has described it as the gay rights movement's Brown v. Board of Education. It is simultaneously broad, in its evocation of our deepest spiritual commitments, and narrow, in its self-conscious attempts to avoid condemning laws against same-sex marriage, prostitution, and bestiality. This Article reconciles these competing claims on Lawrence's jurisprudential legacy. In Part I, it defends the view that Lawrence constitutionalizes what I call metaprivacy : When societal consensus internalizes a breach of the historical legal divide between particular conduct and an associated status, punishment of that conduct cannot be based on moral approbation alone. The Article then, in Part II, harmonizes this view of Lawrence's legacy with pre-Lawrence constitutional privacy doctrine and theory. Finally, in Part III, the Article applies this understanding of Lawrence interdoctrinally, to capital sentencing. The Article suggests that all that separates the impermissible moral judgments made by a legislature in prohibiting sodomy from the permissible indeed, almost constitutionally required-moral judgments made during the sentencing phase of a capital trial is a preference for gays over other a priori criminals. Notwithstanding the obvious appeal of permitting such a preference, Lawrence provides no support for it 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The Yale law journal  |d New Haven, Conn. : Yale Law Journal Co., 1892  |g (2005)  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341344834  |w (DE-600)2067193-3  |w (DE-576)107204967  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g year:2005 
856 |u https://openyls.law.yale.edu/bitstream/20.500.13051/17719/2/Beyond_Lawrence.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/230161870.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2307/20455675  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 439296812X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1866322397 
LOK |0 005 20231019043653 
LOK |0 008 231019||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE37552560 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw