|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000nam a22000002 4500 |
001 |
1866319620 |
003 |
DE-627 |
005 |
20231019043649.0 |
007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
008 |
231019s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)1866319620
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)KXP1866319620
|
040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rda
|
041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
084 |
|
|
|a 2,1
|2 ssgn
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Murphy, Daniel S.
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
245 |
1 |
2 |
|a A Convict Criminology Perspective on Women Guarding Men
|
264 |
|
1 |
|c 2007
|
336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
520 |
|
|
|a The etics-emics debate, “neutral objectivity” versus “biased subjectivity,” is ongoing within the academy. As academics we are indoctrinated into, and convince ourselves of, the ideology of objectivity. We are subjective human beings who attempt to develop objective standards. This stated, we are subjective by nature yet strive for the arcamedian point of absolute neutrality. The present paper explores the positivenegative aspects of incorporating personal-subjective experience(s) in teaching criminal justice. The reality of subjectivity is explored within the context of the unobtainable pursuit of pure objectivity
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a NC DOCKS at Appalachian State University
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://core.ac.uk/download/149232952.pdf
|x Verlag
|z kostenfrei
|3 Volltext
|
912 |
|
|
|a NOMM
|
935 |
|
|
|a mkri
|
951 |
|
|
|a BO
|
ELC |
|
|
|a 1
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 001 4392964752
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 003 DE-627
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 004 1866319620
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 005 20231019043649
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 008 231019||||||||||||||||ger|||||||
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 035
|a (DE-2619)CORE48214470
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 040
|a DE-2619
|c DE-627
|d DE-2619
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 092
|o n
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 852
|a DE-2619
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 852 1
|9 00
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 935
|a core
|
OAS |
|
|
|a 1
|
ORI |
|
|
|a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw
|