I See Dead People: Examining the Admissibility of Living-Victim Photographs in Murder Trials

In the summer of 2015, the Tennessee legislature debated and passed the Victim Life Photo Act, which went into effect on July 1, 2015. This law states: In a prosecution for any criminal homicide, an appropriate photograph of the victim while alive shall be admissible evidence when offered by the dis...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rychlak, Susanna (Author)
Format: Electronic Book
Language:English
Published: 2016
In:Year: 2016
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Check availability: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 1866319272
003 DE-627
005 20250115054911.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231019s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1866319272 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1866319272 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Rychlak, Susanna  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a I See Dead People: Examining the Admissibility of Living-Victim Photographs in Murder Trials 
264 1 |c 2016 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In the summer of 2015, the Tennessee legislature debated and passed the Victim Life Photo Act, which went into effect on July 1, 2015. This law states: In a prosecution for any criminal homicide, an appropriate photograph of the victim while alive shall be admissible evidence when offered by the district attorney general to show the general appearance and condition of the victim while alive. Victims' rights groups lobbied for this and similar laws throughout the country, which were then enacted by state legislatures. Though these laws amended rules of evidence, the considerations under which they were passed were largely normative, emotional, and based on concerns for victims' families in the trial process. In general, living-victim photographs have very low relevance. Often the only issues they demonstrate in a homicide case are the identity of an individual and that he or she was once alive, neither of which is often contested. Thus, with little to no relevance, in-life photos are often introduced into evidence for the same reason that these laws were passed: to humanize the victim, appease grieving family members, and elicit emotions of bias, sympathy ... [and] retribution in the jury. As such, these photographs would be-and often have been- excluded from evidence during a trial as lacking relevance or being unfairly prejudicial under a Rule 403 balancing test. New waves of state legislation, however, have eviscerated these balancing considerations, taking admissibility determinations out of the hands of judges and legislatively mandating that these photos be admissible 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/230475282.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4392964329 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1866319272 
LOK |0 005 20231019043649 
LOK |0 008 231019||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE68451718 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw