Agent Narc Is Not Your Client: Reflections on the Proper Understanding of the Relationship between Prosecutors and Investigating Agencies

Assistant United States Attorneys increasingly conceive federal lawenforcement agents as their clients in criminal prosecutions. As both a descriptive and normative matter, this cannot be right. As a descriptive matter, official interpretations by the Department of Justice, the bench, the bar, and a...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Leonetti, Carrie (Author)
Format: Electronic Book
Language:English
Published: 2017
In:Year: 2017
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Check availability: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 1866312308
003 DE-627
005 20250115054910.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231019s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1866312308 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1866312308 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Leonetti, Carrie  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Agent Narc Is Not Your Client: Reflections on the Proper Understanding of the Relationship between Prosecutors and Investigating Agencies 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Assistant United States Attorneys increasingly conceive federal lawenforcement agents as their clients in criminal prosecutions. As both a descriptive and normative matter, this cannot be right. As a descriptive matter, official interpretations by the Department of Justice, the bench, the bar, and academic commentators almost always reject this client conception. It is inconsistent with the conception of prosecutorial obligations espoused by Brady v. Maryland, the American Bar Association model rules of ethics, federal statutes, and evidentiary law. As a normative matter, it could have serious implications for the law of attorney malpractice, prosecutorial immunity, the disclosure of favorable evidence to the defense, the fair adjudication of suppression hearings, the exercise of prosecutorial charging discretion, and the prevention of official misconduct 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/230130398.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 439295594X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1866312308 
LOK |0 005 20231019043636 
LOK |0 008 231019||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE68246393 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw