Toward a penology of organizational offending

The punishment of organizational offending has largely been overlooked by penologists, despite the fact that organizational actors such as corporations and the state perpetrate the most serious forms of offending. Accordingly, this paper represents a step toward foregrounding organizational offendin...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Sutton, James E (Author) ; Peoples, Clayton D. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2023
In: Punishment & society
Year: 2023, Volume: 25, Issue: 4, Pages: 1100-1118
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1866159631
003 DE-627
005 20231019013221.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231018s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/14624745221132803  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1866159631 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1866159631 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Sutton, James E  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Toward a penology of organizational offending 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The punishment of organizational offending has largely been overlooked by penologists, despite the fact that organizational actors such as corporations and the state perpetrate the most serious forms of offending. Accordingly, this paper represents a step toward foregrounding organizational offending within the discipline of penology. We begin by discussing the implications of several Classical School ideals and theories of punishment for organizational offending, with special emphases on challenges and contradictions. We then review control strategies that are unique to organizational offending, and we go on to contemplate how expressive and non-institutional tactics might potentially factor into how organizational offending is punished. When taken together, these sections reveal the limitations of penology's traditional assumptions of an individual offender and individual offending. We conclude by outlining our view of what a penology of organizational offending should accomplish. 
650 4 |a state corporate crime 
650 4 |a State Crime 
650 4 |a Punishment 
650 4 |a Penology 
650 4 |a Organizational deviance 
650 4 |a Corporate Crime 
700 1 |a Peoples, Clayton D.  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1172920656  |0 (DE-627)1042004722  |0 (DE-576)51487550X  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Punishment & society  |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1999  |g 25(2023), 4, Seite 1100-1118  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)302467211  |w (DE-600)1491224-7  |w (DE-576)079719708  |x 1741-3095  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:25  |g year:2023  |g number:4  |g pages:1100-1118 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745221132803  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4391840391 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1866159631 
LOK |0 005 20231018043728 
LOK |0 008 231018||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2023-10-17#D564C0023AA7E04A50C66F645C74A93499ED6828 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw