How Earl Warren's Twenty-Two Years in Law Enforcement Affected His Work as Chief Justice

Before becoming governor of California, Earl Warren had spent his entire legal career, twenty-two years, in law enforcement. Professor Kamisar maintains that this experience significantly influenced Warren's work as a Supreme Court justice and gave him a unique perspective into police interroga...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kamisar, Yale (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Libro
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2005
En:Año: 2005
Acceso en línea: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 1866157477
003 DE-627
005 20250125054914.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231018s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1866157477 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1866157477 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Kamisar, Yale  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a How Earl Warren's Twenty-Two Years in Law Enforcement Affected His Work as Chief Justice 
264 1 |c 2005 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Before becoming governor of California, Earl Warren had spent his entire legal career, twenty-two years, in law enforcement. Professor Kamisar maintains that this experience significantly influenced Warren's work as a Supreme Court justice and gave him a unique perspective into police interrogation and other police practices. This article discusses some of Warren's experiences in law enforcement and searches for evidence of that experience in Warren's opinions. For example, when Warren was head of the Alameda County District Attorney's Office, he and his deputies not only relied on confessions in many homicide cases but also themselves interrogated homicide suspects. The seeds of the Miranda v. Arizona opinion may well have been Warren's own keen awareness of the opportunities for coercion and exploitation of confusion in the custodial interrogation setting. Moreover, when district attorney, Warren sought to professionalize the police, as well as the prosecutors in his own office. His belief that well-trained law enforcement officials could satisfy the most demanding standards also helps explain his Miranda opinion. Warren's critics viewed his Court's criminal procedure rulings as handcuffing the police, but as has been noted by one of Warren's biographers (and former law clerks), G. Edward White, the Chief Justice was convinced that his rulings were not hampering law enforcement, but ennobling it 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/232690203.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4391838230 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1866157477 
LOK |0 005 20231018043726 
LOK |0 008 231018||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE69321996 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw