Justice and Efficiency: An Empirical Study on Simplified Procedure for Guilty Plea Cases

This study explores the simplified procedure for guilty plea cases emerged in the context of the rise of crime in China. It examines the effect of the simplified procedure and the relevance of the concept of guilty plea in practice, seeking to answer the questions such as: how efficient was it in pr...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Li, Bensen (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Libro
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2012
En:Año: 2012
Acceso en línea: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 1866153137
003 DE-627
005 20250122054858.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231018s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1866153137 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1866153137 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Li, Bensen  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Justice and Efficiency: An Empirical Study on Simplified Procedure for Guilty Plea Cases 
264 1 |c 2012 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This study explores the simplified procedure for guilty plea cases emerged in the context of the rise of crime in China. It examines the effect of the simplified procedure and the relevance of the concept of guilty plea in practice, seeking to answer the questions such as: how efficient was it in process durations in the simplified procedure? Is there any difference for guilty plea cases in sentencing between simplified procedure and regular procedure cases? What is the core problem in considerations and relationship between justice and efficiency in the simplified procedure? To answer these questions, the empirical study is developed on the basis of relevant case summaries collected from the database of Chinalawinfo and surveys carried out in Beijing, Shanghai, Zhejiang, and Hunan in China. Three basic ideas come out from it: First, the duration of process in the simplified procedure changes little, particularly in trial stage. Second, there is no substantial difference for guilty plea cases in sentencing between simplified procedure and regular procedure cases. Third, the simplified procedure without the support of the public defense system would be deemed defective. Under these findings, it appears better to improve the presence of defense to ultimately overcome the ineffectiveness or problems in the implementation of the simplified procedure 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/289227769.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4391833891 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1866153137 
LOK |0 005 20231018043720 
LOK |0 008 231018||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE78798790 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
LOK |0 939   |a 18-10-23  |b l01 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw