Perfectly Properly Triable in the United States: Is Extradition a Real and Significant Threat to Foreign Antitrust Offenders?

Seeking extradition of foreign officers in charge of foreign corporations for trial in the United States is one of the latest policies that the U.S. Department of Justice ( DOJ ) has adopted to enforce U.S. antitrust laws internationally. As a result, the world has become a much riskier place for fo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Kim, Daseul (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Buch
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2008
In:Jahr: 2008
Online-Zugang: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 1866145045
003 DE-627
005 20250124054858.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231018s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1866145045 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1866145045 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Kim, Daseul  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Perfectly Properly Triable in the United States: Is Extradition a Real and Significant Threat to Foreign Antitrust Offenders? 
264 1 |c 2008 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Seeking extradition of foreign officers in charge of foreign corporations for trial in the United States is one of the latest policies that the U.S. Department of Justice ( DOJ ) has adopted to enforce U.S. antitrust laws internationally. As a result, the world has become a much riskier place for foreign officers and executives, who, in the past, could practically ignore U.S. antitrust laws and still hide safely behind the protection of their own countries' borders. The DOJ expects this real and significant threat of extradition to incentivize foreign corporate officers to comply with U.S. antitrust laws by altering their conduct, and how they operate their businesses. However, the possible changes effected by the threat of extradition may take a more indirect form than one might suspect. While some of the existing comments and publications seem to tout this new DOJ policy as a universal threat applicable to all foreign officers around the world, there are inherent and practical limitations to international extradition that make it difficult to apply in most cases. This Note will argue that the changes that the DOJ seeks to effect by implementing the new international enforcement policy may take place more indirectly and informally than through the use of international extradition per se 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/230971811.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4391825805 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1866145045 
LOK |0 005 20231018043708 
LOK |0 008 231018||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE68722471 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw