Embracing Choice and Abandoning the Ballot: Lessons from Berkeley's Popular Defeat of Sit-Lie

In November 2012, Berkeley voters defeated Measure S, an ordinance that would have made it illegal to sit down in Berkeley's commercial districts during most of the day, a so-called sit-lie law. Sit-lie laws have become increasingly prevalent nationwide as a means to combat the presence of home...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Oxsen, Courtney (Author)
Format: Electronic Book
Language:English
Published: 2014
In:Year: 2014
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Check availability: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002 4500
001 1866143506
003 DE-627
005 20231018043706.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231018s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1866143506 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1866143506 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Oxsen, Courtney  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Embracing Choice and Abandoning the Ballot: Lessons from Berkeley's Popular Defeat of Sit-Lie 
264 1 |c 2014 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In November 2012, Berkeley voters defeated Measure S, an ordinance that would have made it illegal to sit down in Berkeley's commercial districts during most of the day, a so-called sit-lie law. Sit-lie laws have become increasingly prevalent nationwide as a means to combat the presence of homeless individuals in downtown areas, ever since Seattle's sit-lie regulation was upheld by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in 1996. Debate over the efficacy and constitutionality of sit-lie laws has been fierce nationally and in individual localities. Proponents of the measure say sit-lie laws are a necessary tool for law enforcement to maintain order in public spaces, protect local economies and community members, and usher homeless people into public services. Opponents counter that such laws are inhumane towards homeless individuals, ineffictive as a solution to the crisis of homelessness in the United States or the economic woes of local business, and meant only to hide the homeless from view and preserve the comfort of the fInancially priveleged. This Note contextualizes Measure S within a larger framework of the sit-lie movement nationwide and explicates a proposal with applicable lessons from from Berkeley's experience for municipalities, sit-lie proponents, and homelessness advocates facing the potentiality of a sit-lie measure and continued community discussion in their locality 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/230090794.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4391824264 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1866143506 
LOK |0 005 20231018043706 
LOK |0 008 231018||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE68205913 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw