The intoxicated co-witness:effects of alcohol and dyadic discussion on memory conformity and event recall

RATIONALE: Co-witness discussion is common and often witnesses are under the influence of alcohol. As such, it is important to understand how such factors may influence eyewitness testimony. OBJECTIVES: We combined a co-witness memory paradigm with an alcohol administration paradigm to examine the i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Albery, Ian P. (VerfasserIn)
Beteiligte: Gawrylowicz, Julie ; Frings, Daniel ; Bartlett, Georgina
Medienart: Elektronisch Buch
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2021
In:Jahr: 2021
Online-Zugang: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 1866139975
003 DE-627
005 20250113054901.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231018s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s00213-021-05776-0  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1866139975 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1866139975 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Albery, Ian P.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The intoxicated co-witness:effects of alcohol and dyadic discussion on memory conformity and event recall 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a RATIONALE: Co-witness discussion is common and often witnesses are under the influence of alcohol. As such, it is important to understand how such factors may influence eyewitness testimony. OBJECTIVES: We combined a co-witness memory paradigm with an alcohol administration paradigm to examine the influence of alcohol and dyadic discussion on remembering a mock crime. METHODS: Intoxicated and sober dyads discussed a previously seen video, whilst in a control condition sober and intoxicated individuals recalled the event on their own. Unknown to the dyads, each discussion partner saw a different version of the video including unique details not present in the other video version. All participants then engaged in a second individual recall attempt. RESULTS: Dyads were more likely to recall misleading details in their individual recall attempts compared to the control group. Intoxicated and sober dyads were equally likely to report misleading information. Alcohol intoxication had no negative impact on individuals’ ability to correctly identify the source of their responses. Intoxicated participants recalled fewer details under free recall conditions. Alcohol had a detrimental effect on participants’ confidence in their free recall accounts. CONCLUSIONS: Possible alcohol-related and social-cognitive mechanisms are discussed which may contribute to the current findings as well as applied implications for interviewing intoxicated witnesses 
700 1 |a Gawrylowicz, Julie  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Frings, Daniel  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Bartlett, Georgina  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
856 |u https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00213-021-05776-0.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/385605964.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-021-05776-0  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4391820730 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1866139975 
LOK |0 005 20231018043701 
LOK |0 008 231018||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE18522543 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw