Miranda Thirty-Five Years Later: A Close Look at the Majority and Dissenting Opinions in Dickerson

Over the years, Miranda v. Arizona1 has been criticized both for going too far2 and for not going far enough.3 Nevertheless, on the basis of talks with many criminal procedure professors in the sixteen months between the time a panel of the Fourth Circuit upheld a statute (18 U.S.C. § 3501) purporti...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kamisar, Yale (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Libro
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2001
En:Año: 2001
Acceso en línea: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 1866135910
003 DE-627
005 20250125054904.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231018s2001 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1866135910 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1866135910 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Kamisar, Yale  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Miranda Thirty-Five Years Later: A Close Look at the Majority and Dissenting Opinions in Dickerson 
264 1 |c 2001 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Over the years, Miranda v. Arizona1 has been criticized both for going too far2 and for not going far enough.3 Nevertheless, on the basis of talks with many criminal procedure professors in the sixteen months between the time a panel of the Fourth Circuit upheld a statute (18 U.S.C. § 3501) purporting to overrule Miranda and a 7-2 majority of the Supreme Court overturned that ruling in the case of Dickerson v. United States,4 I am convinced that most criminal procedure professors wanted the Supreme Court to do what it did- reaffirm Miranda. This is not surprising. As Professor Grano once observed, a person need only attend academic conferences on criminal procedure to discover how discrete and insular 'conservatives' are in academia. 5 However, I think all the many professors teaching criminal procedure realized that we would be in much greater demand if the Fourth Circuit's ruling were to be upheld by the Supreme Court-if the centerpiece of the Warren Court's revolution in American criminal procedure were to be eradicated by the Rehnquist Court. For in such an event the resulting confusion would have been enormous-and we would have been popping up on radio and television in much the way all those election law specialists did during the protracted 2000 presidential election 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/232690220.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4391816679 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1866135910 
LOK |0 005 20231018043653 
LOK |0 008 231018||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE69323128 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw