A Good Enough Reason: Addiction, Agency and Criminal Responsibility

The article begins by contrasting medical and moral views of addiction and how such views influence responsibility and policy analysis. It suggests that since addiction always involves action and action can always be morally evaluated, we must independently decide whether addicts do not meet respons...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Morse, Stephen J. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2013
In: Inquiry
Year: 2013
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1866135457
003 DE-627
005 20250121054858.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231018s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/0020174x.2013.806134  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1866135457 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1866135457 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Morse, Stephen J.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Morse, Stephen J. 
245 1 2 |a A Good Enough Reason: Addiction, Agency and Criminal Responsibility 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The article begins by contrasting medical and moral views of addiction and how such views influence responsibility and policy analysis. It suggests that since addiction always involves action and action can always be morally evaluated, we must independently decide whether addicts do not meet responsibility criteria rather than begging the question and deciding by the label of ‘disease’ or ‘moral weakness’. It then turns to the criteria for criminal responsibility and shows that the criteria for criminal responsibility, like the criteria for addiction, are all folk psychological. Therefore, any scientific information about addiction must be ‘translated’ into the law’s folk psychological criteria. Distractions about responsibility are then quickly canvassed. Then it addresses the direct relation between addiction and criminal responsibility. It argues that most addicts retain sufficient rational and control capacities at the relevant times to be held responsible, especially for crimes that are not part of the definition of addiction itself. It suggests that there is good reason to excuse or mitigate addicts for the crimes of purchase and possession for personal use. It concludes by briefly considering what contemporary science can contribute to our understanding of addiction and agency 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Inquiry  |d London [u.a.] : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1958  |g (2013)  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)302923667  |w (DE-600)1492782-2  |w (DE-576)079964354  |x 1502-3923  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g year:2013 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/151695067.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2013.806134  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4391816210 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1866135457 
LOK |0 005 20231018043652 
LOK |0 008 231018||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE49698062 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw