|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000cam a22000002c 4500 |
| 001 |
186613213X |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20250114054904.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
231018s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)186613213X
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)KXP186613213X
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rda
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 084 |
|
|
|a 2,1
|2 ssgn
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Bartrum, Ian C.
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Justice as Fair Division
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2018
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a The current hyperpoliticization of the Court grows out of a feedback loop between politicized appointments and politicized decision-making. This Article suggests a change in the internal procedures by which the Court hears and decides particular cases. A three-Justice panel hears and decides each case. Appeal to an en banc sitting of the entire Court would require a unanimous vote of all non-recused Justices. This Article explores several possible approaches in selecting the three-Justice panel. This Article proposes that applying a fair division scheme to the Court's decision-making process might act to reverse this loop and work to depoliticize the Court over time
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2217&context=facpub
|x Verlag
|z kostenfrei
|3 Volltext
|
| 935 |
|
|
|a mkri
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a BO
|
| ELC |
|
|
|a 1
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 001 4391812894
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 003 DE-627
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 004 186613213X
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 005 20231018043648
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 008 231018||||||||||||||||ger|||||||
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 035
|a (DE-2619)CORE18989498
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 040
|a DE-2619
|c DE-627
|d DE-2619
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 092
|o n
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852
|a DE-2619
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852 1
|9 00
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 935
|a core
|
| OAS |
|
|
|a 1
|
| ORI |
|
|
|a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw
|
