Does suffering suffice? An experimental assessment of desert retributivism

Michael S. Moore is among the most prominent normative theorists to argue that retributive justice, understood as the deserved suffering of offenders, justifies punishment. Moore claims that the principle of retributive justice is pervasively supported by our judgments of justice and sufficient to g...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bauer, Paul C. (Autor)
Otros Autores: Poama, Andrei
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2020
En: PLOS ONE
Año: 2020
Acceso en línea: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1866129929
003 DE-627
005 20250115002429.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231018s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1371/journal.pone.0230304  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1866129929 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1866129929 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |8 1\p  |a Bauer, Paul C.  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1231415541  |0 (DE-627)1754885578  |4 aut 
109 |a Bauer, Paul C.  |a Bauer, Paul Cornelius 
245 1 0 |a Does suffering suffice? An experimental assessment of desert retributivism 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Michael S. Moore is among the most prominent normative theorists to argue that retributive justice, understood as the deserved suffering of offenders, justifies punishment. Moore claims that the principle of retributive justice is pervasively supported by our judgments of justice and sufficient to ground punishment. We offer an experimental assessment of these two claims, (1) the pervasiveness claim, according to which people are widely prone to endorse retributive judgments, and (2) the sufficiency claim, according to which no non-retributive principle is necessary for justifying punishment. We test these two claims in a survey and a related survey experiment in which we present participants (N = ~900) with the stylized description of a criminal case. Our results seem to invalidate claim (1) and provide mixed results concerning claim (2). We conclude that retributive justice theories which advance either of these two claims need to reassess their evidential support.The politics and administration of institutional chang 
700 1 |8 2\p  |a Poama, Andrei  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1171912846  |0 (DE-627)1041697872  |0 (DE-576)513905820  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t PLOS ONE  |d San Francisco, California, US : PLOS, 2006  |g (2020)  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)523574592  |w (DE-600)2267670-3  |w (DE-576)281331979  |x 1932-6203  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g year:2020 
856 |u https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230304&type=printable  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/322380739.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230304  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
883 |8 1  |a cgwrk  |d 20241001  |q DE-101  |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 
883 |8 2  |a cgwrk  |d 20241001  |q DE-101  |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4391810689 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1866129929 
LOK |0 005 20231018043644 
LOK |0 008 231018||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE28270349 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw