Beyond the Warren Court and Its Conservative Critics: Toward a Unified Theory of Constitutional Criminal Procedure

Part I develops more fully the differences that divide liberal and conservative commentators on criminal procedure, taking special note of the series of Reports prepared by the Justice Department's Office of Legal Policy and published recently in the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dripps, Donald A. (Author)
Format: Electronic Book
Language:English
Published: 1990
In:Year: 1990
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Check availability: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002 4500
001 1866126865
003 DE-627
005 20231018043640.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231018s1990 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1866126865 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1866126865 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Dripps, Donald A.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Beyond the Warren Court and Its Conservative Critics: Toward a Unified Theory of Constitutional Criminal Procedure 
264 1 |c 1990 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Part I develops more fully the differences that divide liberal and conservative commentators on criminal procedure, taking special note of the series of Reports prepared by the Justice Department's Office of Legal Policy and published recently in the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform. Part II explains my disquiet with the suggestion that original-meaning jurisprudence ought to guide criminal procedure doctrine. Part II also defends the thesis that the fourteenth amendment protects the individual interest in freedom from unjust punishment, rather than any abstract interest in truth for its own sake. Part III considers two familiar controversies in criminal procedure-the fourth amendment exclusionary rule and confessions-from the revised perspective developed in Part II. Part IV adumbrates some possible applications of the revised perspective to trial procedure. These possibilities illustrate that the risk of unjust punishment remains very far from irreducible and that the fourteenth amendment authorizes measures to move this risk closer to its practical minimum 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/232711665.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4391807629 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1866126865 
LOK |0 005 20231018043640 
LOK |0 008 231018||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE69339049 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw