Involuntary Competence in United States Criminal Law

This is a draft of a chapter that has been accepted for publication by Oxford University Press in the forthcoming book Fitness to Plead: International and Comparative Perspectives edited by Ronnie Mackay and Warren Brookbanks due for publication in May 2018. It addresses whether the state may forcib...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Morse, Stephen J. (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Libro
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2017
En:Año: 2017
Acceso en línea: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 1866125974
003 DE-627
005 20250115054902.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231018s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1866125974 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1866125974 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Morse, Stephen J.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Morse, Stephen J. 
245 1 0 |a Involuntary Competence in United States Criminal Law 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This is a draft of a chapter that has been accepted for publication by Oxford University Press in the forthcoming book Fitness to Plead: International and Comparative Perspectives edited by Ronnie Mackay and Warren Brookbanks due for publication in May 2018. It addresses whether the state may forcibly medicate an unwilling defendant or prisoner to restore competence in the criminal process, including competence to stand trial, competence to plead guilty and to waive trial rights, competence to represent oneself, and competence to be sentenced. It begins with a description of the doctrinal and mental health background information and the right of prisoners generally to refuse psychotropic medication. The succeeding section discusses the general balance of interests that obtains in deciding this issue and then canvases the particular competencies in question with analysis and recommendations for future directions. The general thesis is that the interest of both the state and the individual in finality is so weighty that forcible medication is justified in most cases if it is necessary to permit the criminal process to proceed. A brief conclusion follows 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/151696007.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4391806738 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1866125974 
LOK |0 005 20231018043638 
LOK |0 008 231018||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE49698702 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw