|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a22000002c 4500 |
001 |
186612496X |
003 |
DE-627 |
005 |
20250115054902.0 |
007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
008 |
231018s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)186612496X
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)KXP186612496X
|
040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rda
|
041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
084 |
|
|
|a 2,1
|2 ssgn
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Steyn, Esther
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Plea-bargaining in South Africa: Current concerns and future prospects
|
264 |
|
1 |
|c 2016
|
336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
520 |
|
|
|a The powers of the prosecution service in South Africa are extensive, particularly when it comes to the exercise of its discretion to institute criminal proceedings, to negotiate plea and sentence agreements and to divert matters from the criminal process. A court cannot prevent a prosecutor from withdrawing a matter or from accepting a specific plea. It is the state that remains dominus litis. However it will be sufficient for the purposes of this paper to focus on how the prosecution service exercises its power when it negotiates a plea and sentence bargain and then to examine and determine the usefulness, fairness and the constitutionality of this process after 1994
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://core.ac.uk/download/185438663.pdf
|x Verlag
|z kostenfrei
|3 Volltext
|
935 |
|
|
|a mkri
|
951 |
|
|
|a BO
|
ELC |
|
|
|a 1
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 001 4391805723
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 003 DE-627
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 004 186612496X
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 005 20231018043635
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 008 231018||||||||||||||||ger|||||||
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 035
|a (DE-2619)CORE16172862
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 040
|a DE-2619
|c DE-627
|d DE-2619
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 092
|o n
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 852
|a DE-2619
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 852 1
|9 00
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 935
|a core
|
OAS |
|
|
|a 1
|
ORI |
|
|
|a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw
|