The Logic of Aboriginal Rights

Are there any aboriginal rights? If there are, then what kind of rights are they? Are they human rights adapted and shaped to the circumstances of indigenous peoples? Or are they specific cultural rights, exclusive to members of aboriginal societies? In recent liberal political theory, aboriginal ri...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ivison, Duncan (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2003
En: Ethnicities
Año: 2003
Acceso en línea: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1866124323
003 DE-627
005 20250125054859.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231018s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/14687968030033003  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1866124323 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1866124323 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Ivison, Duncan  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Logic of Aboriginal Rights 
264 1 |c 2003 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Are there any aboriginal rights? If there are, then what kind of rights are they? Are they human rights adapted and shaped to the circumstances of indigenous peoples? Or are they specific cultural rights, exclusive to members of aboriginal societies? In recent liberal political theory, aboriginal rights are often conceived of as cultural rights and thus as group rights. As a result, they are vulner- able to at least three kinds of objections: i) that culture is not a primary good relevant to the currency of egalitarian justice; ii) that group rights are inimical to the moral individualism of liberal democratic societies; and iii) that pandering to group interests provides incentives for abuse and undermines the conditions required for promoting liberal egalitarian outcomes. My argument is that a success- ful defense of aboriginal rights will tie them to the promotion of the equal freedom of aboriginal people, both in the formal and substantive senses, and thus to improve- ments in their actual wellbeing, both as ‘peoples’ and individuals. But rights and norms interact in complex ways, and the translation of particular individual and social goods into the language of rights is always fraught with difficulty 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethnicities  |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 2001  |g (2003)  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)331507919  |w (DE-600)2051877-8  |w (DE-576)276271696  |x 1741-2706  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g year:2003 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/61689089.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968030033003  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4391805081 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1866124323 
LOK |0 005 20231018043634 
LOK |0 008 231018||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE9185264 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw