Long Over-Due Process: Proposing a New Standard for Pretrial Detainees' Length of Confinement Claims

Prolonged pretrial detention poses one of the greatest unchecked threats to due process in the United States. The Supreme Court has never announced the proper analysis to adjudicate detainees’ allegations of prolonged detention pending trial (for criminal detainees) or removal (for noncitizens in im...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Huennekens, Kendall (Author)
Format: Electronic Book
Language:English
Published: 2022
In:Year: 2022
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Check availability: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002 4500
001 1866123335
003 DE-627
005 20231018043633.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231018s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1866123335 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1866123335 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Huennekens, Kendall  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Long Over-Due Process: Proposing a New Standard for Pretrial Detainees' Length of Confinement Claims 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Prolonged pretrial detention poses one of the greatest unchecked threats to due process in the United States. The Supreme Court has never announced the proper analysis to adjudicate detainees’ allegations of prolonged detention pending trial (for criminal detainees) or removal (for noncitizens in immigration detention centers). Because the Court has continually ducked this constitutional question, detainees and courts alike lack guidance regarding how to vindicate this fundamental liberty interest. This Note identifies the inconsistencies in the Court’s due process jurisprudence generally, as well as the dangers intrinsic to collapsing the standards used to evaluate pretrial detainees’ claims under the Due Process Clause and prisoners’ claims under the Eighth Amendment. In the wake of the Court’s holding in Kingsley v. Hendrickson, this Note argues that the Court should expand an objective due process analysis to detainees’ overdetention claims in place of the subjective analysis derived from the Eighth Amendment. This Note further argues that freedom from overdetention is a fundamental right protected by substantive due process, and it proposes a framework with graduated levels of scrutiny to be applied to pretrial criminal detainees’ and noncitizens’ overdetention claims 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/516030290.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4391804093 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1866123335 
LOK |0 005 20231018043633 
LOK |0 008 231018||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE40840493 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw