Evidentiary Barriers to Conviction and Two Models of Criminal Procedure: A Comparative Study

Comparative research of criminal justice systems is still in its infancy. It is not surprising, then, that when questions are asked transcending the concerns of a single system very little is actually known, and answers tend to be mostly in the nature of impressionistic beliefs and vague hypotheses....

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Damaska, Mirjan R (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Libro
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 1973
En:Año: 1973
Acceso en línea: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 1866123211
003 DE-627
005 20250129054848.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231018s1973 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2307/3311301  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1866123211 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1866123211 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Damaska, Mirjan R  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Evidentiary Barriers to Conviction and Two Models of Criminal Procedure: A Comparative Study 
264 1 |c 1973 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Comparative research of criminal justice systems is still in its infancy. It is not surprising, then, that when questions are asked transcending the concerns of a single system very little is actually known, and answers tend to be mostly in the nature of impressionistic beliefs and vague hypotheses. One such belief, frequently voiced, is that the rules of evidence under the common law adversary system of criminal procedure present much more formidable barriers to conviction than do corresponding rules in the non-adversary civil law system. This belief is then related to a more general feeling that the higher evidentiary barricades to conviction somehow emanate from the very nature of adversary proceedings and that their lowering smacks of the inquisitorial continental procedure. Both beliefs are interesting to a comparatist 
856 |u https://openyls.law.yale.edu/bitstream/20.500.13051/831/2/Evidentiary_Barriers_to_Conviction_and_Two_Models_of_Criminal_Procedure.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/72828317.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2307/3311301  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4391803976 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1866123211 
LOK |0 005 20231018043633 
LOK |0 008 231018||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE37555856 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw