Taking the Stand: Access to Justice for Witnesses with Mental Disabilities in Sexual Assault Cases

In this article the authors argue that the existing adversarial trial process often prevents the stories of sexual assault complainants with mental disabilities from being heard in court. Relying on social science evidence, the authors argue that subjecting a woman with a mental disability to a rigo...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Benedet, Janine (Autor)
Otros Autores: Grant, Isabel
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Libro
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2012
En:Año: 2012
Acceso en línea: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 1866122436
003 DE-627
005 20250122054855.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231018s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1866122436 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1866122436 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Benedet, Janine  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Taking the Stand: Access to Justice for Witnesses with Mental Disabilities in Sexual Assault Cases 
264 1 |c 2012 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In this article the authors argue that the existing adversarial trial process often prevents the stories of sexual assault complainants with mental disabilities from being heard in court. Relying on social science evidence, the authors argue that subjecting a woman with a mental disability to a rigorous cross-examination with repeated and leading questions, in a manner that is confrontational and often accusatory, is probably the worst way to get her story heard accurately in court. It is likely to unfairly undermine her credibility and to result in unjustified acquittals or in prosecutors deciding not to pursue a case. The article examines the challenges posed by traditional methods of cross-examination for witnesses with cognitive, developmental, or intellectual disabilities that affect their ability to recall, process, and communicate information, suggesting that existing Criminal Code accommodations are inadequate to address these concerns. Cross-examination should be conducted in a way that respects both the right of the accused to a fair trial and the complainant’s right to sex equality. Relying on developments in other jurisdictions, the authors recommend adopting a system of victim support persons or intermediaries, which would allow witnesses with mental disabilities to have assistance in understanding questions and in communicating their evidence to the court as fully as possible. Judges should also be given explicit legislative authority to intervene to disallow questions that are inappropriate based on the particular witness’s abilities. Such accommodations facilitate rather than impede the truth-seeking function of a trial and are not inconsistent with the fair trial rights of the accused 
700 1 |a Grant, Isabel  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/232624912.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4391803194 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1866122436 
LOK |0 005 20231018043632 
LOK |0 008 231018||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE69281164 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw