|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000cam a22000002c 4500 |
| 001 |
1866122304 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20250128054844.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
231018s1983 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)1866122304
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)KXP1866122304
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rda
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 084 |
|
|
|a 2,1
|2 ssgn
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Michigan Law Review
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Controlling Jury Damage Awards in Private Antitrust Suits
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 1983
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a This Note takes the position that the courts should better control jury manipulation in private antitrust actions. Part One suggests that manipulation is likely in such actions, and argues that this manipulation off ends the legislative judgment reflected in the trebling provision without leading to more equitable results. Part Two presents two complementary proposals to control jury manipulation of treble damage awards. These proposals aim to induce the jury to return accurate awards based on the economic loss actually suffered by the plaintiff
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://core.ac.uk/download/287000670.pdf
|x Verlag
|z kostenfrei
|3 Volltext
|
| 935 |
|
|
|a mkri
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a BO
|
| ELC |
|
|
|a 1
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 001 4391803062
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 003 DE-627
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 004 1866122304
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 005 20231018043632
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 008 231018||||||||||||||||ger|||||||
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 035
|a (DE-2619)CORE77773326
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 040
|a DE-2619
|c DE-627
|d DE-2619
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 092
|o n
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852
|a DE-2619
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852 1
|9 00
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 935
|a core
|
| OAS |
|
|
|a 1
|
| ORI |
|
|
|a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw
|
