The New Yugoslav Criminal Code

THE new Yugoslav Criminal Code, which became effective on July 1, 1951, is of twofold interest to students of criminal law. First of all, it is a contemporary specimen of codification. More importantly, it is an instrument reflecting the ideological assumptions of a Communist State. The achievement...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Donnelly, Richard C. (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Buch
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 1952
In:Jahr: 1952
Online-Zugang: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 1865843806
003 DE-627
005 20250131054855.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231017s1952 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1865843806 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1865843806 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Donnelly, Richard C.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The New Yugoslav Criminal Code 
264 1 |c 1952 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a THE new Yugoslav Criminal Code, which became effective on July 1, 1951, is of twofold interest to students of criminal law. First of all, it is a contemporary specimen of codification. More importantly, it is an instrument reflecting the ideological assumptions of a Communist State. The achievement of justice in criminal cases depends upon four interacting variables: personnel, administration, procedure, and the substantive law of crimes. Criminal law reformers have been concerned chiefly with the first three. For example, there have been important studies of crime causation and legal responsibility. The revulsion against retribution as the aim of punishment- generated by Nineteenth Century Humanitarianism-has been fortified by the new insights into human motivation revealed by the behavior sciences. The development of probation, parole, and other release procedures as alternatives to penal commitment, and the individualization of sentencing and treatment, are other trends of significance. The American Law Institute's Code of Criminal Procedure and the recent Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure have given impetus to needed improvements in criminal procedure. In the end, however, criminal justice must rest upon a satisfactory substantive law of crimes. Although Great Britain and the United States stand in the vanguard of the penological reform movement, the forces directing this movement have shown little interest in the criminal law proper. In fact, the substantive law of crimes in the United States remains uncertain, obscure, formally defective, inconsistent and antiquated. If by codification is meant the effort to simplify, synthesize and systematize law by the positive legislative formulation of inclusive and operationally defined principles, Great Britain and the United States have lagged far behind Continental countries. There are compilations of statutes, sometimes designated as codes and sometimes not, but these are rarely systematic bodies of law. There have been sporadic and haphazard amendments to the statutes but these have been mostly patch-work jobs. Except for the 1942 Louisiana Code, there have been but few major efforts to codify the substantive law of crimes 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/72835418.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4390882201 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1865843806 
LOK |0 005 20231017043721 
LOK |0 008 231017||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE37561341 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw