Comparisons of Three Different Investigative Interview Techniques With Young Children

After viewing a film of a mother hitting her son, a film not seen by the college student interviewers, children were misinformed about a detail (via exposure to a misleadingquestion) as well as explicitly coached to disclose 3 false details. The children were then interviewed by interviewers who had...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Chapman, Mary Tantalo (VerfasserIn)
Beteiligte: Thomas, Stuart W. ; Samsock, David ; Lindberg, Marc A ; Lindberg, Anders W.
Medienart: Elektronisch Buch
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2003
In:Jahr: 2003
Online-Zugang: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 1865840947
003 DE-627
005 20250125054849.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231017s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1865840947 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1865840947 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Chapman, Mary Tantalo  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Comparisons of Three Different Investigative Interview Techniques With Young Children 
264 1 |c 2003 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a After viewing a film of a mother hitting her son, a film not seen by the college student interviewers, children were misinformed about a detail (via exposure to a misleadingquestion) as well as explicitly coached to disclose 3 false details. The children were then interviewed by interviewers who had previously learned 1 of 3 different interviewing procedures: the Yuille Step-Wise Interview developed by J. C. Yuille, R. Hunter,R. Joffe, & J. Zaparniuk (1993); a doll play interview developed by Action for Child Protection Inc. (1994); or the Modified Structured Interview developed for this study. The Modified Structured Interview yielded more “where” information and was better at detecting if coaching had occurred. However, the interviewers were not very good at discriminating suggested versus coached versus correct witnessed information. The authors found that the deeper one digs for memories, the more one uncovers incorrect versus correct items. They concluded that although the Modified Structured Interview was superior tothe techniques currently in use, cautions are necessary 
700 1 |a Thomas, Stuart W.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Samsock, David  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Lindberg, Marc A  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Lindberg, Anders W.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/232709464.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4390879340 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1865840947 
LOK |0 005 20231017043716 
LOK |0 008 231017||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE69337309 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw