|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000cam a22000002c 4500 |
| 001 |
1865840092 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20250129054847.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
231017s1975 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)1865840092
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)KXP1865840092
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rda
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 084 |
|
|
|a 2,1
|2 ssgn
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Michigan Law Review
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Ex Post Facto Limitations on Legislative Power
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 1975
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a This Note explores the rationale underlying the prohibition of ex post facto laws and formulates an analytic framework for a more principled application .of the prohibition. This analytic framework is then used, first, to critique the present strict application of the prohibition to changes in criminal punishments and determine whether the prohibition should be applied to sanctions imposed outside the criminal context, and, second, to determine the degree to which the prohibition should be applied to procedural changes
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://core.ac.uk/download/270045823.pdf
|x Verlag
|z kostenfrei
|3 Volltext
|
| 935 |
|
|
|a mkri
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a BO
|
| ELC |
|
|
|a 1
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 001 4390878492
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 003 DE-627
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 004 1865840092
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 005 20231017043715
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 008 231017||||||||||||||||ger|||||||
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 035
|a (DE-2619)CORE75482381
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 040
|a DE-2619
|c DE-627
|d DE-2619
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 092
|o n
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852
|a DE-2619
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852 1
|9 00
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 935
|a core
|
| OAS |
|
|
|a 1
|
| ORI |
|
|
|a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw
|
