Section 718.2(e) of the Criminal Code and Aboriginal Overrepresentation in Canadian Prisons

Aboriginal peoples have been recognized as statistically overrepresented in the Canadian prison system, incarcerated at a rate nearly ten times the rate of the non-Aboriginal population. Despite their overrepresentation being recognized in academic literature, government reports, and Supreme Court r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Irons, Meaghan (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Buch
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2018
In:Jahr: 2018
Online-Zugang: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 186583792X
003 DE-627
005 20250114054858.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231017s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)186583792X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP186583792X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Irons, Meaghan  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Section 718.2(e) of the Criminal Code and Aboriginal Overrepresentation in Canadian Prisons 
264 1 |c 2018 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Aboriginal peoples have been recognized as statistically overrepresented in the Canadian prison system, incarcerated at a rate nearly ten times the rate of the non-Aboriginal population. Despite their overrepresentation being recognized in academic literature, government reports, and Supreme Court rulings, the rate of Aboriginal incarceration has not decreased. In 1996, section 718.2(e) of the Canadian Criminal Code was enacted. Its purpose was to address the overrepresentation of Aboriginal peoples in Canadian prisons by requiring sentencing judges to consider sanctions other than imprisonment for all offenders, and specifically pay attention to the unique circumstances of Aboriginal offenders. In 1999, the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Gladue reaffirmed the application and importance of this section for sentencing judges. This paper addresses the question: what was the legislative purpose of enacting s.718.2(e) of the Criminal Code, and why has it failed up to this point? It is argued that the Supreme Court’s clarifications and section 718.2(e) alone cannot remedy the issue of Aboriginal overrepresentation as the section only applies to sentencing, one aspect of the larger institutional criminal justice structure. In enacting this provision, the Canadian government overlooked the systemic social, financial, and historic inequalities that contribute to Aboriginal criminality. Thus, section 718.2(e) alone is unable to reduce the disproportionate incarceration rates as the root causes of Aboriginal criminality continue to go unaddressed 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/215386274.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4390876325 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 186583792X 
LOK |0 005 20231017043712 
LOK |0 008 231017||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE9193747 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw