PELIGROSIDAD, ALGORITMOS Y DUE PROCESS: EL CASO STATE vs. LOOMIS

The contemporary tendency towards replacing the old notion of dangerousness by the risk assessment approach, that began in the correctional settings, is reaching other stages of the criminal justice, particularly the sentencing phase. Presenting itself as an evidence-based practice (evidence-based s...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Martínez Garay, Lucía (Author)
Format: Electronic Book
Language:Spanish
Published: 2020
In:Year: 2020
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Check availability: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 1865823937
003 DE-627
005 20250113054850.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231017s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||spa c
024 7 |a 10.5944/rdpc.20.2018.26484  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1865823937 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1865823937 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a spa 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Martínez Garay, Lucía  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a PELIGROSIDAD, ALGORITMOS Y DUE PROCESS: EL CASO STATE vs. LOOMIS 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The contemporary tendency towards replacing the old notion of dangerousness by the risk assessment approach, that began in the correctional settings, is reaching other stages of the criminal justice, particularly the sentencing phase. Presenting itself as an evidence-based practice (evidence-based sentencing), it promotes introducing structured risk assessments in sentencing in order to help the judge impose the penalty that best prevents recidivism. This paper critically examines one of the first State Supreme Court decisions in the USA that has had to face the problems posed by this approach, and especially the following: is it compatible with due process rights to impose an enhanced sentence based on the risk assessment made by a secret algorithm, the details of which are not disclosed to the defendant due to its proprietary nature?El movimiento contemporáneo tendente a la sustitución de la noción de peligrosidad por el enfoque de la valoración del riesgo (risk assessment), que se inició en el ámbito del derecho penitenciario y de ejecución de las penas, está llegando a otras fases del proceso penal, como la de sentencia. Presentándose como una práctica «basada en la evidencia» (evidence-based sentencing), propugna tomar en consideración las valoraciones estructuradas del riesgo de reincidencia a la hora de determinar la clase y cuantía de la pena a imponer, para adecuarla mejor a las necesidades de prevención especial. El presente trabajo analiza críticamente una de las primeras sentencias de un tribunal supremo estatal de los EEUU que se ha enfrentado a los problemas que plantea esta propuesta, y en particular al siguiente: ¿es compatible con el derecho al debido proceso agravar la pena sobre la base de la valoración de riesgo hecha por un algoritmo, cuyo funcionamiento no se desvela al acusado porque está protegido como secreto de empresa?The contemporary tendency towards replacing the old notion of dangerousness by the risk assessment approach, that began in the correctional settings, is reaching other stages of the criminal justice, particularly the sentencing phase. Presenting itself as an evidence-based practice (evidence-based sentencing), it promotes introducing structured risk assessments in sentencing in order to help the judge impose the penalty that best prevents recidivism. This paper critically examines one of the first State Supreme Court decisions in the USA that has had to face the problems posed by this approach, and especially the following: is it compatible with due process rights to impose an enhanced sentence based on the risk assessment made by a secret algorithm, the details of which are not disclosed to the defendant due to its proprietary nature 
856 |u http://revistas.uned.es/index.php/RDPC/article/download/26484/20947  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [deprecated] 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/475135785.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.5944/rdpc.20.2018.26484  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4390862332 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1865823937 
LOK |0 005 20231017043648 
LOK |0 008 231017||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE11372557 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw