Who Deserves Diversion? A Theoretical Critique of Mitigation, Consequentialism, and the Juvenile Court
The juvenile court was created as a means of diverting youth from the criminal justice system, and, in turn, diversion within the juvenile court has been used for a variety of purposes. This paper argues that an understanding of diversion, and its implications, requires distinguishing deservingness...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Otros Autores: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
2023
|
| En: |
Journal of contemporary criminal justice
Año: 2023, Volumen: 39, Número: 4, Páginas: 570-589 |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Palabras clave: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1862622663 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231013012606.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231012s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/10439862231189616 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1862622663 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1862622663 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Zane, Steven N. |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1206380470 |0 (DE-627)1692394754 |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Zane, Steven N. |a Zane, Steven | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Who Deserves Diversion? A Theoretical Critique of Mitigation, Consequentialism, and the Juvenile Court |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The juvenile court was created as a means of diverting youth from the criminal justice system, and, in turn, diversion within the juvenile court has been used for a variety of purposes. This paper argues that an understanding of diversion, and its implications, requires distinguishing deservingness and consequentialism. Analysis of the former goal entails a focus on mitigation and draws attention to a critical gap in scholarship—namely, how do juvenile courts decide which youth deserve diversion? While risk and needs assessments likely play a role, so, too, may mitigation assessments about which youth are more deserving of interventions that may impose less punishment and more rehabilitation. In advancing this argument, we discuss ways in which a focus on diversion, and on mitigation, help to illuminate fundamental tensions in juvenile justice. We discuss, too, ways in which this focus can help to advance research and policy. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Culpability | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Punishment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Juvenile Court | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Mitigation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Diversion | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mears, Daniel P. |d 1966- |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)14183675X |0 (DE-627)704074796 |0 (DE-576)182331253 |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of contemporary criminal justice |d London : Sage, 1978 |g 39(2023), 4, Seite 570-589 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)324529228 |w (DE-600)2027876-7 |w (DE-576)095238050 |x 1552-5406 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:39 |g year:2023 |g number:4 |g pages:570-589 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/10439862231189616 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a NOMM | ||
| 935 | |a mkri | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 39 |j 2023 |e 4 |h 570-589 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4385506043 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1862622663 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20231012043609 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 231012||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2023-09-30#61245EBA1903A6BC187AACC7D75BF90AAC32C513 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-2619 |c DE-627 |d DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||