Has Anything Changed? An Analysis of Federal Custodial Litigation Cases Post Kingsley v. Hendrickson
The Supreme Court set a standard of deliberate indifference for correctional conditions of confinement cases and have historically required proof of staff members’ state-of-mind. The Kingsley v. Hendrickson decision signaled a shift from that subjective requirement when the court applied a less oner...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2023
|
| In: |
The prison journal
Year: 2023, Volume: 103, Issue: 4, Pages: 427-447 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Keywords: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1856629015 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230822021512.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230821s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/00328855231188440 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1856629015 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1856629015 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Tartaro, Christine |d 1970- |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)13803138X |0 (DE-627)696285258 |0 (DE-576)183899393 |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Tartaro, Christine 1970- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Has Anything Changed? An Analysis of Federal Custodial Litigation Cases Post Kingsley v. Hendrickson |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The Supreme Court set a standard of deliberate indifference for correctional conditions of confinement cases and have historically required proof of staff members’ state-of-mind. The Kingsley v. Hendrickson decision signaled a shift from that subjective requirement when the court applied a less onerous objective standard in a case involving excessive force against a pretrial detainee. The question is how the Federal Appeals Courts would interpret Kingsley? Our findings indicate that the 12 courts differ in their application of the objective and subjective standards for conditions of confinement cases, including those for suicides of pretrial detainees. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Section 1983 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Jails | |
| 650 | 4 | |a suicide litigation | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nunez, Geldy |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The prison journal |d London : Sage, 1921 |g 103(2023), 4, Seite 427-447 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)324534272 |w (DE-600)2028491-3 |w (DE-576)096930292 |x 1552-7522 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:103 |g year:2023 |g number:4 |g pages:427-447 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/00328855231188440 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mkri | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 103 |j 2023 |e 4 |h 427-447 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4368182553 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1856629015 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230821043605 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230821||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2023-08-20#F3FD246B54E14F11F3BF2394646CB7EC2B101921 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-2619 |c DE-627 |d DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a zota |a tiep | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||