Critical Prison Research and University Research Ethics Boards: homogenization of Inquiry and Policing of Carceral Knowledge
This article illustrates how authoritative regulatory practices that research ethics boards may deploy when assessing non-traditional social research may pave the way to a homogenization of inquiry and forms of policing of knowledge. The authors sought institutional ethics clearance from multiple re...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Beteiligte: | |
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2018
|
| In: |
Oñati Socio-Legal Series
Jahr: 2018, Band: 8, Heft: 2, Seiten: 225-246 |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Rechteinformation: | CC BY 4.0 |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Schlagwörter: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1854304070 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240311145742.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230803s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0931 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1854304070 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1854304070 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Balfour, Gillian |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Critical Prison Research and University Research Ethics Boards |b homogenization of Inquiry and Policing of Carceral Knowledge |c Gillian Balfour, Joane Martel |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 243-246 | ||
| 520 | |a This article illustrates how authoritative regulatory practices that research ethics boards may deploy when assessing non-traditional social research may pave the way to a homogenization of inquiry and forms of policing of knowledge. The authors sought institutional ethics clearance from multiple research ethics boards in the case of a critically-oriented participatory action-based study with formerly incarcerated persons in Canada. Evidence is provided from two case studies. Two unexpected challenges were encountered from research ethics board members. The first challenge was related to the board’s stereotypical bias about the violent potential of former prisoners (as co-researchers and participants). The second challenge was related to an overly cautious interpretation of federal ethical guidelines leading to the exclusion of Indigenous peoples from the project. Both challenges have in common that they point to research ethics boards’ possible role in the policing of knowledge which may jeopardize researchers’ ability to engage in critical scholarship. | ||
| 520 | |a El artículo ilustra las prácticas regulatorias autoritarias que los comités de ética en investigación pueden adoptar, y cómo éstas allanan el camino a la homogeneización de las indagaciones y a la vigilancia sobre la producción de conocimiento. Se exhiben pruebas de dos estudios de caso en los cuales los miembros del comité se toparon con situaciones que no esperaban. La primera estaba relacionada con el sesgo típico de los comités sobre el potencial violento de antiguos reclusos, y la segunda, con una interpretación excesivamente prudente de directrices éticas federales, lo cual desembocó en la exclusión de personas indígenas del proyecto. Ambas situaciones señalan al posible rol de los comités de ética como vigilantes de la producción de conocimiento, algo que podría poner en peligro la capacidad de los investigadores para realizar una labor académica crítica. | ||
| 540 | |q DE-2619 |a Namensnennung 4.0 International |f CC BY 4.0 |2 cc |u http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Canada | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Canadá | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Indigenous | |
| 650 | 4 | |a critical research | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Cárcel | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Indígenas | |
| 650 | 4 | |a investigación crítica | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Prison | |
| 650 | 4 | |a research ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a ética de la investigación | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Martel, Joane |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |a Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law |t Oñati Socio-Legal Series |d Oñati : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 2011 |g 8(2018), 2, Seite 225-246 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)718614828 |w (DE-600)2661059-0 |w (DE-576)365227927 |x 2079-5971 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:2018 |g number:2 |g pages:225-246 |
| 856 | |u https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/download/903/1097 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [deprecated] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0931 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/903 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4362809392 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1854304070 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240311145742 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230803||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21-110 |c DE-627 |d DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a krzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||
