RT Article
T1 Terrorism analysis and Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project: the missing element
JF Terrorism and political violence
VO 31
IS 4
SP 800
OP 816
A1 Wralstad Ulmschneider, Georgia
A2 Lutz, James M. 1946-
LA English
YR 2019
UL https://krimdok.uni-tuebingen.de/Record/1848976151
AB The decision in the case of Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project raised important issues about civil liberties in the United States (2010), including freedom of speech and freedom of association, in relation to U.S. foreign policy actions. While the decision has the potential to infringe on certain liberties, the decision itself was based on very limited information on the nature of terrorism, the foreign terrorist organizations involved, and the processes by which terrorist groups can be induced to peacefully re-enter domestic political systems. There are also concerns about what can be the arbitrary designation of groups as foreign terrorist organizations. These issues raise serious questions about the role of the Supreme Court in the overall political system and judgments in cases involving terrorism and foreign policy.
NO Gesehen am 14.06.2023
NO Published online: 01 Mar 2017
K1 civil liberties
K1 foreign terrorist organizations
K1 Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project
K1 U.S. foreign policy
K1 U.S. supreme court
DO 10.1080/09546553.2017.1289089