Terrorism analysis and Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project: the missing element

The decision in the case of Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project raised important issues about civil liberties in the United States (2010), including freedom of speech and freedom of association, in relation to U.S. foreign policy actions. While the decision has the potential to infringe on certain li...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Wralstad Ulmschneider, Georgia (Autor)
Otros Autores: Lutz, James M. 1946-
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2019
En: Terrorism and political violence
Año: 2019, Volumen: 31, Número: 4, Páginas: 800-816
Acceso en línea: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (Verlag)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a2200000 c 4500
001 1848976151
003 DE-627
005 20230614121924.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230614s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/09546553.2017.1289089  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1848976151 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1848976151 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Wralstad Ulmschneider, Georgia  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Terrorism analysis and Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project: the missing element  |c Georgia Wralstad Ulmschneider and James M. Lutz 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Gesehen am 14.06.2023 
500 |a Published online: 01 Mar 2017 
520 |a The decision in the case of Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project raised important issues about civil liberties in the United States (2010), including freedom of speech and freedom of association, in relation to U.S. foreign policy actions. While the decision has the potential to infringe on certain liberties, the decision itself was based on very limited information on the nature of terrorism, the foreign terrorist organizations involved, and the processes by which terrorist groups can be induced to peacefully re-enter domestic political systems. There are also concerns about what can be the arbitrary designation of groups as foreign terrorist organizations. These issues raise serious questions about the role of the Supreme Court in the overall political system and judgments in cases involving terrorism and foreign policy. 
650 4 |a civil liberties 
650 4 |a foreign terrorist organizations 
650 4 |a Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project 
650 4 |a U.S. foreign policy 
650 4 |a U.S. supreme court 
700 1 |a Lutz, James M.  |d 1946-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)132559552  |0 (DE-627)523646135  |0 (DE-576)162062826  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Terrorism and political violence  |d London : Cass, 1989  |g 31(2019), 4, Seite 800-816  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)349234795  |w (DE-600)2080322-9  |w (DE-576)113563507  |x 1556-1836  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:31  |g year:2019  |g number:4  |g pages:800-816 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2017.1289089  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09546553.2017.1289089  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4337135812 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1848976151 
LOK |0 005 20230614121924 
LOK |0 008 230614||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw