Edwin H. Sutherland: an improbable criminological key thinker - for critical criminologists and for mainstream criminologists
Edwin H. Sutherland’s status as a key thinker among criminologists - for many critical criminologists as well as mainstream criminologists - is addressed, with special attention to the various dimensions of his background that render this status highly improbable. Sutherland’s principal contribution...
1. VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Veröffentlicht: |
2017
|
In: |
Critical criminology
Jahr: 2017, Band: 25, Heft: 1, Seiten: 55-69 |
Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Schlagwörter: |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1848948859 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240321150325.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230614s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10612-016-9320-0 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1848948859 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1848948859 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Friedrichs, David O. |d 1944- |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1055010718 |0 (DE-627)792493699 |0 (DE-576)174830459 |4 aut | |
109 | |a Friedrichs, David O. 1944- |a Friedrichs, David 1944- | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Edwin H. Sutherland: an improbable criminological key thinker - for critical criminologists and for mainstream criminologists |c David O. Friedrichs |
264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Litgeraturverzeichnis: Seite 67-69 | ||
520 | |a Edwin H. Sutherland’s status as a key thinker among criminologists - for many critical criminologists as well as mainstream criminologists - is addressed, with special attention to the various dimensions of his background that render this status highly improbable. Sutherland’s principal contributions to criminology are identified along with the limitations of these contributions. While Sutherland is especially known for his theory of differential association, his own history suggests that "influence" broadly conceived is complex and idiosyncratic and does not lend itself well to straightforward prediction, hence a "theory" of differential influence (applying differential quite differently from Sutherland) is advanced. Some attention is devoted to contemporaries or near contemporaries (including the Dutch Marxist Willem Bonger) of Sutherland in relation to why their influence has been more limited than that of Sutherland. Criminological "influence" is complex, and not easily testable. A closing section identifies some typically overlooked radical observations of Sutherland’s. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Critical Criminologist | |
650 | 4 | |a Differential Association | |
650 | 4 | |a Social Pathologist | |
650 | 4 | |a White Collar Crime | |
650 | 4 | |a White Collar Offender | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Critical criminology |d Dordrecht : Springer Science + Business Media B.V., 1996 |g 25(2017), 1, Seite 55-69 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)340870907 |w (DE-600)2065477-7 |w (DE-576)110352254 |x 1572-9877 |7 nnas |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:25 |g year:2017 |g number:1 |g pages:55-69 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-016-9320-0 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4336870438 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1848948859 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20240321150325 | ||
LOK | |0 008 230614||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21-110 |c DE-627 |d DE-21-110 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21-110 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a krzo | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw |