Taking sides?: issues of bias and partisanship when researching socio-political conflict
The article unpacks the issues of bias and partisanship - and the risk of being accused of these - which confront social scientists who study socio-political conflict. Drawing on the author’s experience when conducting research on the conflict between animal liberation activists and their state and...
1. VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Veröffentlicht: |
2017
|
In: |
Critical criminology
Jahr: 2017, Band: 25, Heft: 2, Seiten: 231-244 |
Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Schlagwörter: |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 184890228X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240328080545.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230613s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10612-017-9355-x |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)184890228X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP184890228X | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Ellefsen, Rune |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1224839854 |0 (DE-627)1744332215 |4 aut | |
109 | |a Ellefsen, Rune | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Taking sides? |b issues of bias and partisanship when researching socio-political conflict |c Rune Ellefsen |
264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 243-244 | ||
520 | |a The article unpacks the issues of bias and partisanship - and the risk of being accused of these - which confront social scientists who study socio-political conflict. Drawing on the author’s experience when conducting research on the conflict between animal liberation activists and their state and corporate adversaries in Britain (1999-2014), the article argues for a relational research approach - focusing on the interaction between contending parties, rather than study stakeholders singly - as a way to overcome challenges of taking sides when studying socio-political conflict. The debate generated by Howard Becker’s classic essay "Whose side are we on?" (1967), now 50 years old, is used throughout the article as a point of reference for addressing the issues involved. The argument is made for constant reflexivity during research on radical social movements, and for "temporary bias" during qualitative fieldwork. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Animal Liberation | |
650 | 4 | |a Criminal Justice Agency | |
650 | 4 | |a Ethnographic Fieldwork | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Participant | |
650 | 4 | |a Social Movement | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Critical criminology |d Dordrecht : Springer Science + Business Media B.V., 1996 |g 25(2017), 2, Seite 231-244 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)340870907 |w (DE-600)2065477-7 |w (DE-576)110352254 |x 1572-9877 |7 nnas |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:25 |g year:2017 |g number:2 |g pages:231-244 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-017-9355-x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4335061226 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 184890228X | ||
LOK | |0 005 20240321150441 | ||
LOK | |0 008 230613||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21-110 |c DE-627 |d DE-21-110 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21-110 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a krzo | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw |