Non-encounter restorative justice interventions – now what?
The ‘encounter conception’ of restorative justice is definitively the most widespread of all, and practices that involve an encounter may well deserve to be called ‘fully restorative’. That said, an encounter between an individual, identifiable ‘victim’ and an equally individual, identifiable ‘offen...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2023
|
| In: |
Contemporary justice review
Year: 2023, Volume: 26, Issue: 1, Pages: 93-110 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Keywords: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 184874028X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230610222017.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230610s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/10282580.2023.2216716 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)184874028X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP184874028X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Cruz da Fonseca Rosenblatt, Fernanda |d 1981- |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1072323087 |0 (DE-627)827144083 |0 (DE-576)432378316 |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Cruz da Fonseca Rosenblatt, Fernanda 1981- |a Rosenblatt, Fernanda Fonseca 1981- |a Fonseca Rosenblatt, Fernanda Cruz da 1981- |a Fonseca Rosenblatt, Fernanda 1981- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Non-encounter restorative justice interventions – now what? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The ‘encounter conception’ of restorative justice is definitively the most widespread of all, and practices that involve an encounter may well deserve to be called ‘fully restorative’. That said, an encounter between an individual, identifiable ‘victim’ and an equally individual, identifiable ‘offender’ is not always possible (or desirable). Indeed, an encounter conception of restorative justice is problematic for a variety of reasons, including for attaching people to distinct labels – those of ‘offender’ and ‘victim’ – when only a few have the ‘paradoxical privilege’ to be recognised as victims. This article is aimed at promoting an exercise of thinking beyond an encounter conception of restorative justice. We would like to argue that such an exercise facilitates the processes of us rethinking the current language of restorative justice (still too restricted compared to the current criminal justice system). It also helps us to acknowledge the movement’s wide-ranging agendas or directions (and to position ourselves within them). | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a offender-centric restorative justice | |
| 650 | 4 | |a victim-centric restorative justice | |
| 650 | 4 | |a victim-offender labels | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Restorative Justice | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Adamson, Craig |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Contemporary justice review |d London [u.a.] : Routledge, 1998 |g 26(2023), 1, Seite 93-110 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341898058 |w (DE-600)2069546-9 |w (DE-576)27177293X |x 1477-2248 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:26 |g year:2023 |g number:1 |g pages:93-110 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2023.2216716 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mkri | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4331267873 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 184874028X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230610043605 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230610||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2023-06-09#3C08576A008DE74A56724E3F905FE1E2DE53792D | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-2619 |c DE-627 |d DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||