Examining the judicial decision to substitute credibility instructions for expert testimony on confessions
Purpose. The present study tested the judicial decision to deny false confession expert testimony on the basis that jury instructions are sufficient to aid jurors in their determinations of disputed confession evidence. Methods. Three groups of mock jurors (N = 150) were presented with a trial summa...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Beteiligte: | ; |
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2016
|
| In: |
Legal and criminological psychology
Jahr: 2016, Band: 21, Heft: 2, Seiten: 319-331 |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1846949602 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230531114713.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230530s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/lcrp.12068 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1846949602 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1846949602 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Gomes, Dayna M. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Examining the judicial decision to substitute credibility instructions for expert testimony on confessions |c Dayna M. Gomes, Douglas M. Stenstrom and Dustin P. Calvillo |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 329-331 | ||
| 500 | |a Gesehen am 30.05.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a First published: 13 September 2014 | ||
| 520 | |a Purpose. The present study tested the judicial decision to deny false confession expert testimony on the basis that jury instructions are sufficient to aid jurors in their determinations of disputed confession evidence. Methods. Three groups of mock jurors (N = 150) were presented with a trial summary that included a videotaped re-enactment of an interrogation in which the interrogator used a maximization ploy. One group received expert testimony in the trial summary, another group received credibility instructions, and a control group received neither. All participants received standard reasonable doubt instructions at the end of the trial summary and then answered questions such as their verdict in the case, the defendant's likelihood of guilt, and the voluntariness of the defendant's confession. Results. The results showed a high rate of conviction that was only reduced when participants received expert testimony. Across all measures, no significant differences were found between the control and credibility instruction groups. Conclusions. The results suggest that credibility instructions are not comparable to expert testimony in influencing jurors' judgments of disputed confession evidence. These findings do not support the judicial decision to deny expert testimony on the basis that credibility instructions alone are sufficient to aid potential jurors in their evaluations of confession evidence. Avenues for future research on expert testimony and jury instructions in confession cases are discussed. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Stenstrom, Douglas M. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Calvillo, Dustin P. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Legal and criminological psychology |d Hoboken, NJ [u.a.] : Wiley, 1996 |g 21(2016), 2, Seite 319-331 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320441695 |w (DE-600)2005001-X |w (DE-576)090886615 |x 2044-8333 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:21 |g year:2016 |g number:2 |g pages:319-331 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12068 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lcrp.12068 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4326920912 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1846949602 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230616154044 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230530||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-2619 |c DE-627 |d DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||